MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132894626

Implications of Degeneracy and Pleiotropy for Homeostatic Regulation of Neuronal Properties

2023· dissertation· W7132894626 on OpenAlexaff
Jane Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomeostasisDegeneracy (biology)Homeostatic plasticityPleiotropyAllostasisMechanism (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal excitability is homeostatically regulated through coordinated adjustments of diverse ion channels. This is possible because the basis for excitability is degenerate—equivalent excitability can be achieved via different ion channels. But one must also consider that ion channels are pleiotropic, meaning that they affect multiple properties. Then how does a neuron co-regulate multiple (degenerate) properties by adjusting pleiotropic channels? The overarching goal of this thesis is to study the implications of pleiotropy and degeneracy for homeostatic regulation of neuronal properties. Using simulations, I showed that successful homeostatic regulation requires that the number of adjustable ion channels (nin) must exceed the number of regulated properties (nout). Those results reveal that homeostatic regulation can fail from having to regulate multiple properties concurrently, which is more challenging than regulating them separately. In collaboration with experimentalists, I conducted simulations to demonstrate that nociceptor excitability is degenerate on the basis of different subtypes of voltage-gated sodium channels (NaVs). This has critical implications for the efficacy of subtype-selective NaV inhibitors: Given that one subtype can compensate for another, the therapeutic effects of blocking NaV1.7 can be offset by compensatory changes in other NaVs (i.e. subversive compensation). I reviewed preclinical and clinical literature on NaV1.7-selective inhibitors to see whether there was evidence for subversive compensation, a possible explanation for why preclinical success did not translate into clinical success. I found that nearly all preclinical studies were single dosing, and would not have observed the effects of subversive compensation. Overall, this thesis shows that degeneracy is an important consideration when trying to understand homeostatic regulation of neuronal excitability under normal and pathological conditions. Indeed, degeneracy predicts that subtype-selective ion channel inhibitors might be particularly prone to having their therapeutic effects subverted by homeostatic regulation of other, non-targeted channels, which is obviously an important yet underappreciated factor in choosing drug targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→