From Unity to Harmony: The Asian Spirit of Harmony in the Selected Documents of the Federation of Asian Bishops' Conferences (FABC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Asia and the Middle East are the birthplace and cradle of the world’s major religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism, as well as many indigenous religions. The spirit of harmony and dialogue that characterizes the lived reality of religious pluralism in an Asian context is an essential resource for an Asian Christian theology. My thesis is that the Asian understanding of religious pluralism in the FABC documents elucidates the reality of religious pluralism in Asia without implying the problematic form of relativism identified in Dominus Iesus. The Asian approach to religious pluralism is observed in FABC Papers no. 75, “Asian Christian Perspectives on Harmony,” and no. 81, “The Spirit at Work in Asia Today,” providing the basis for understanding harmonious religious pluralism in a world of cultural and religious diversity. I make this argument by employing central aspects of Bernard Lonergan’s approach to pluralism and relativism as well as his distinction between doctrinal affirmations and systematic elucidations, which function to support and clarify the FABC’s approach. I illustrate and locate the FABC's contribution through brief discussions of the work of Jacque Dupuis and Frederick E. Crowe. The exchange between the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF) and Dupuis recalls some of the key elements in the difference between the position of Dominus Iesus and FABC documents. A comparison between the Pneumatology of Crowe and Dupuis presents a significant point of convergence despite their different backgrounds. Based on the works of Thomas Aquinas and Bernard Lonergan and the texts of early Ecumenical Councils, Crowe’s Pneumatology presents a speculative understanding of the Holy Spirit as an entry point for interreligious dialogue. Based on the reality of religious pluralism in an Asian context, Dupuis presents a reflection grounded more immediately in pastoral engagement. Despite their diverse starting points, the two paths converge in an enriching appreciation of Pneumatology and confirm the significance of the FABC's contribution: acknowledging the universal presence of the Holy Spirit helps us to understand religious pluralism with a constructive hopefulness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".