MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132898049

From Unity to Harmony: The Asian Spirit of Harmony in the Selected Documents of the Federation of Asian Bishops' Conferences (FABC)

2023· dissertation· en· W7132898049 on OpenAlex
Heejung Cho

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicKarl Barth and Christian Theology
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmony (color)Pluralism (philosophy)Religious pluralismDoctrineFaithIndigenousRelativism
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asia and the Middle East are the birthplace and cradle of the world’s major religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism, as well as many indigenous religions. The spirit of harmony and dialogue that characterizes the lived reality of religious pluralism in an Asian context is an essential resource for an Asian Christian theology. My thesis is that the Asian understanding of religious pluralism in the FABC documents elucidates the reality of religious pluralism in Asia without implying the problematic form of relativism identified in Dominus Iesus. The Asian approach to religious pluralism is observed in FABC Papers no. 75, “Asian Christian Perspectives on Harmony,” and no. 81, “The Spirit at Work in Asia Today,” providing the basis for understanding harmonious religious pluralism in a world of cultural and religious diversity. I make this argument by employing central aspects of Bernard Lonergan’s approach to pluralism and relativism as well as his distinction between doctrinal affirmations and systematic elucidations, which function to support and clarify the FABC’s approach. I illustrate and locate the FABC's contribution through brief discussions of the work of Jacque Dupuis and Frederick E. Crowe. The exchange between the Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith (CDF) and Dupuis recalls some of the key elements in the difference between the position of Dominus Iesus and FABC documents. A comparison between the Pneumatology of Crowe and Dupuis presents a significant point of convergence despite their different backgrounds. Based on the works of Thomas Aquinas and Bernard Lonergan and the texts of early Ecumenical Councils, Crowe’s Pneumatology presents a speculative understanding of the Holy Spirit as an entry point for interreligious dialogue. Based on the reality of religious pluralism in an Asian context, Dupuis presents a reflection grounded more immediately in pastoral engagement. Despite their diverse starting points, the two paths converge in an enriching appreciation of Pneumatology and confirm the significance of the FABC's contribution: acknowledging the universal presence of the Holy Spirit helps us to understand religious pluralism with a constructive hopefulness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it