MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132900315

Non-Invasive Molecular Status Differentiation of Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas From Magnetic Resonance Images Using Machine Learning

2025· dissertation· W7132900315 on OpenAlexaff
Kareem Kudus

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiomicsNomogramIdentification (biology)Magnetic resonance imagingMutationDeep learningKey (lock)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG), the most prevalent central nervous system tumor in childhood, is often driven by one of two genetic alterations: BRAF Fusion or BRAF Mutation. Identification of genetic status is critical for optimal prognostication and treatment of pLGG. Genetic status is typically determined through biopsy, which has associated risks, and in some cases is not possible due to tumor location. A prior study showed that machine learning (ML) approaches could potentially detect pLGG genetic status non-invasively from MR images, reducing the need for surgery. Through three key studies, this thesis aimed to make progress towards a clinically deployable imaging-based pLGG genetic status prediction ML model. When published, the study featured in Chapter 2 provided the most robust evidence available on the ability of ML to distinguish between patients with pLGG driven by BRAF Fusion and Mutation using radiomic features, such as shape or texture, extracted from manually segmented tumor regions of MR images. Strong performance was achieved using a larger cohort and more robust statistical methods than earlier works, verifying the potential of ML-based BRAF status prediction. Additionally, to help encourage clinical uptake, an uncertainty quantification framework and nomogram were developed and validated. The study Chapter 3 was based on expanded beyond hand-crafted radiomics features to investigate an additional method of classifying medical images, deep learning (DL). This study focused on the more realistic task of grouping pLGGs into three categories: BRAF fusion, BRAF mutation, and non-BRAF altered, unlike most earlier studies which ignored cases in the latter class. A comprehensive ML framework combining DL and radiomics proved optimal, outperforming either approach on its own. Chapter 4 introduced a segmentation-free approach, eliminating dependency on manual or automated tumor segmentations. Instead, whole-brain MR images were directly analyzed. A novel in-domain pretraining regimen was used to build tumor segmentation information into classification models. The segmentation-free framework achieved classification accuracy similar to a manual segmentation-based pipeline, without requiring tumor segmentations as an input.Collectively, the findings of this thesis demonstrate the potential of ML to enable non-invasive pLGG genetic profiling, which could help improve outcomes for patients with pLGG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→