MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132902446

The Virus in the Garrison: Contagious Disease in Canadian Fiction

2021· dissertation· W7132902446 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Katherine Joy Shwetz

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsContagious diseaseMetaphorNarrativeDeferenceDiseaseRepresentation (politics)ScholarshipPerspective (graphical)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation analyzes Canadian representations of contagious disease in novels written after the emergence of HIV/AIDS. Ultimately, I argue that contagion in literature registers distinctive fears about the fluid and changeable nature of Canadian communities in an increasingly globalized world. Most existing scholarship on contagious disease in fiction considers contagion on a global or transnational scale, often in deference to the ease with which viruses cross borders. In contrast, my project contends that purely transnational considerations of disease risk flattening key differences in how national communities—particularly the imagined national communities present in literature—shape contagious diseases both physically and metaphorically. In a Canadian context, literary engagements with contagious disease are situated in a discursively unique environment informed by legacies of colonialism, globalization, and fraught national identity. This research stands as one of the first inquiries into the representation of contagious disease in contemporary Canadian fiction.Each of the chapters attends to one of three narrative motifs common in how Canadian authors deploy contagious disease in their fiction: contact, apocalypse, and mutation. Crucially, the texts under consideration all pair representations of contagious disease as metaphor with an awareness of contagious disease as embodied reality, a connection that speaks to the intersections of imagined community with lived experience. The first chapter, which considers Lee Maracle’s Ravensong duology, attends both to traumatic colonial contact and to the conditions necessary for more equitable forms of engagement. In the apocalypse chapter, I examine how Emily St. John Mandel’s Station Eleven and Nick Cutter’s The Troop engage with the fraught process of confronting precarity. In the final chapter, which centers on mutation, I argue that Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy deconstructs the generic conventions of plague narrative in the service of a commentary on the limitations of narrative in disease contexts. Taken together, these texts chart deep anxieties about the outcomes of confronting the porous boundaries of imagined community on both metaphorical and embodied levels. This dissertation concludes by re- engaging the key claims made in the body of this project in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, finding evidence of further narrative shifts in representations of contagion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicGothic Literature and Media AnalysisFrench-language works237,207