MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132902542

Hepatocyte Growth Factor-Preconditioned Neural Progenitor Cells Attenuate Astrocyte Reactivity and Promote Neurite Outgrowth

2018· dissertation· W7132902542 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel Dragas

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2018
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver physiology and pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAstrocyteNeuriteProgenitor cellChondroitin sulfate proteoglycanGlial fibrillary acidic proteinHepatocyte growth factorRegeneration (biology)Growth factorCentral nervous systemProteoglycan
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The astroglial scar is a defining hallmark of secondary pathology following central nervous system (CNS) injury that significantly obstructs neuroregeneration. Neural progenitor cell (NPC) therapies for repair and regeneration have demonstrated favourable outcomes not only via cell replacement, but trophic support. In an effort to strategically enhance this secretory potential, we utilized the regenerative aptitude of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) as a cellular preconditioning agent and assessed the capacity of modified secretome to attenuate astrocyte reactivity in vitro. HGF-preconditioned NPCs demonstrated increased levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 and reduced vascular endothelial growth factor compared to untreated NPCs. In reactive astrocytes, HGF-enhanced NPC secretome reduced glial fibrillary acidic protein expression and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan deposition to a greater extent than either treatment alone, and enhanced neurite outgrowth of co-cultured neurons. These findings have important translational implications for modification of the post-injury milieu and optimization of cell-based strategies for CNS injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicLiver physiology and pathologyFrench-language works237,207