Playing Queer and Performing Gender at the Turn of the Eighteenth Century: The Unconventional Life, Voice, and Body of Julie D’Aubigny Maupin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The late seventeenth century in Western Europe is an intriguing period for queer historians: the imagined boundaries between genders, sexual orientations, and even biological sexes were considered far more permeable than we might expect of such a patriarchal society. In this study, I look to this era not to find a perfect reflection of my own queer non-binary identity, but to explore the culturally-contingent nature of all understandings of gender. At the centre of my research is seventeenth-century opera singer Julie d’Aubigny Maupin. Maupin was gender- non-conforming in her outward appearance, openly involved with lovers of all genders, and was an expert fencer and duellist. Simultaneously an outstanding exception to the conventions of gender in her day, and an example of the fluid possibilities of gender at the turn of the eighteenth century, Maupin serves as the case study through which I explore the ever-shifting perceptions of queer and gender-non-conforming people in this era. Through careful review of the few available sources, I reconstruct, as far as possible, an outline of Maupin’s life—and, due to the variable reliability of these sources, I note the many vagaries, contradictions, and impossibilities along the way. As I navigate this “speculative biography,” I rely on Valerie Traub’s concept of the unknowability of history, and am therefore careful to hold space for ambiguity, uncertainty, and all too often, an unsatisfiable curiosity. In subsequent chapters, I bring several aspects of Maupin’s life story, including her gender expression, sexuality, and status as a performer, into conversation with the surrounding social context of late seventeenth-century France, allowing me to offer insight into how Maupin’s contemporaries might have viewed her, as well as how her life relates to twenty-first century perspectives on gender. I then explore the many links between identity, character, and voice through an analysis of Maupin as a singer and performer, choosing four of Maupin’s most iconic roles and investigating them using interrelated lenses of historical context, performance practice, and my own embodied experience of singing excerpts from these operas. Lastly, I reflect on my personal connection with Maupin, and explore the philosophical implications of trying to retell a story as strange and unknowable as hers. Drawing on the Brechtian-inspired tradition of feminist theatre criticism set out by Elaine Aston, Sue-Ellen Case, and Gay Gibson Cima, I discuss the process of developing and writing the text for La Maupin, a solo cantata about Maupin’s life which I commissioned and premiered as a way to share her story with a wider audience. Throughout the dissertation, I also bring my research into dialogue with current views on gender-non-conforming people, including the latest research on the voice as a gendered phenomenon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".