Prioritizing Children’s Well-Being: Child-Centrism and Parent and Relationship Outcomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Child-centrism is a highly endorsed parenting approach in which parents prioritize their children’s well-being over their own. Despite initial evidence that child-centrism may promote better parenting experiences—particularly for mothers—research has yet to examine child-centrism in fathers, and test whether these benefits extend to other aspects of parent well-being (e.g., health, sleep), or relationships within the family system (i.e., parent-child, romantic, and coparenting relationships). Thus, in this mixed method dissertation, I provided a nuanced examination of mother and father child-centrism, including its manifestations, motivations, and potential consequences for parents and family relationships. In Study 1 (N = 192 parents from the U.S.), I demonstrated that mothers and fathers interpret and respond to the child-centrism scale similarly and established the validity of child-centrism measures included in all studies. Across three studies, including an online mixed method study of American parents (N = 195), and in-depth interview studies with Canadian (Study 3a; N = 26) and Swiss (Study 3b; N = 40) parents, I conducted gender comparisons of child-centrism endorsement, and identified qualitative themes among parents’ child-centric behaviors and motivations, and their impact on parents’ well-being and relationships. In the next three studies, I analyzed two sets of triadic data (Study 4 and 5b; N = 2009 couples and 960 of their children, Study 5a; N = 178 couples and their children) to examine mother and father trajectories of child-centrism over time and reveal how within-couple (mis)matches in child-centrism are linked with parent well-being and relationship outcomes. Four key findings emerged, including that (1) mothers and fathers endorse child-centrism to a similar extent, (2) child-centrism normatively declines as children age, (3) mothers are particularly expected to be child-centric and exhibit different manifestations and motivations of child-centrism than fathers, and (4) child-centrism was a mixed blessing for parents, associated with benefits and costs for their well-being, and their parent-child, romantic, and coparenting relationships. Overall, this research suggests that mother and father child-centrism are both impactful for shaping family well-being and highlights the importance of studying parenting constructs at the dyadic level and across the whole family system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".