MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132908984

Prioritizing Children’s Well-Being: Child-Centrism and Parent and Relationship Outcomes

2024· dissertation· W7132908984 on OpenAlexaffabout
Natalie Mae Sisson

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFamily Dynamics and Relationships
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoparentingTest (biology)Scale (ratio)Qualitative researchFamily systemsDyad
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Child-centrism is a highly endorsed parenting approach in which parents prioritize their children’s well-being over their own. Despite initial evidence that child-centrism may promote better parenting experiences—particularly for mothers—research has yet to examine child-centrism in fathers, and test whether these benefits extend to other aspects of parent well-being (e.g., health, sleep), or relationships within the family system (i.e., parent-child, romantic, and coparenting relationships). Thus, in this mixed method dissertation, I provided a nuanced examination of mother and father child-centrism, including its manifestations, motivations, and potential consequences for parents and family relationships. In Study 1 (N = 192 parents from the U.S.), I demonstrated that mothers and fathers interpret and respond to the child-centrism scale similarly and established the validity of child-centrism measures included in all studies. Across three studies, including an online mixed method study of American parents (N = 195), and in-depth interview studies with Canadian (Study 3a; N = 26) and Swiss (Study 3b; N = 40) parents, I conducted gender comparisons of child-centrism endorsement, and identified qualitative themes among parents’ child-centric behaviors and motivations, and their impact on parents’ well-being and relationships. In the next three studies, I analyzed two sets of triadic data (Study 4 and 5b; N = 2009 couples and 960 of their children, Study 5a; N = 178 couples and their children) to examine mother and father trajectories of child-centrism over time and reveal how within-couple (mis)matches in child-centrism are linked with parent well-being and relationship outcomes. Four key findings emerged, including that (1) mothers and fathers endorse child-centrism to a similar extent, (2) child-centrism normatively declines as children age, (3) mothers are particularly expected to be child-centric and exhibit different manifestations and motivations of child-centrism than fathers, and (4) child-centrism was a mixed blessing for parents, associated with benefits and costs for their well-being, and their parent-child, romantic, and coparenting relationships. Overall, this research suggests that mother and father child-centrism are both impactful for shaping family well-being and highlights the importance of studying parenting constructs at the dyadic level and across the whole family system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsFrench-language works237,207