MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132914567

Role of the mTOR Pathway and Autophagy in Mediating PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Small Cell Lung Cancer

2022· dissertation· W7132914567 on OpenAlexaff
Ranya Barayan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagySensitizationPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaymTORC1PARP inhibitorLung cancerSynthetic lethalityPoly ADP ribose polymerase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive form of lung cancer with a dismal 5-year survival rate of 7%. Despite initial response rates (70-80%) to DNA damaging agents, patient relapse accompanied with treatment resistance is inevitable. Poly (ADP)-ribose inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel therapy that has been evaluated for SCLC treatment and are in clinical trials. There is increasing interest in identifying targetable factors involved in PARPi sensitization for combinatorial therapeutic strategies. This study shows that the mTOR pathway mediates PARPi sensitivity in SCLC cells through CRISPR genetic screens. We hypothesized that the constitutive activation of mTORC1 suppresses pro-survival autophagy. We used functional genetic validation with shRNAs to knock down the TSC1/2 complex and observed significant sensitization of SCLC cells to PARPi. Our data support that pharmacologically inhibiting autophagy is synergistic with PARPi in SCLC cells, creating a novel avenue for developing combination therapies to improve overall survival for SCLC patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207