Bibliographic record
Abstract
Parents’ time devoted to unpaid care for their children remains persistently gendered and is a key driver of gender inequality at home and work. At the same time, both mothers and fathers report a strong desire for more time with children, driven by norms prescribing an intensification of parenthood. These care pressures may be alleviated by work-family policy, an institutional tool that provides financial and normative imperatives for (re)shaping gendered arrangements of paid work and unpaid care. This dissertation explores how work-family policies aimed at or available to fathers – reserved paternity leave and workplace flexibility – shape parents’ time with children in Canada and the United States. These three chapters innovate on the conceptualization of parent-child time, considering a broader scope of time (total co-present time) and the co-presence of the other parent (solo versus family time). First, I examine how a state-provided reserved paternity leave policy in the quasi-experimental setting of Québec impacts fathers’ and mothers’ time with children. This policy led to a plausibly causal increase in fathers’ “responsibility time,” i.e., solo parenting time across activities when co-present with children. Similarly, this policy led to a plausibly causal increase in mothers’ solo parenting time in routine childcare, likely because of a corresponding decrease in housework time. Second, looking at employer-provided policy, I investigate how workplace flexibility policies are associated with fathers’ time with children in the United States. Flextime (control over start and stop times) and flexplace (work from home or remote work) are associated with increased “family” time with children – when the mother is also present – across activities. Taken together, these studies show that work-family policies aimed at or accessed by fathers can reshape gendered arrangements of unpaid care for children. However, this depends on the policy design (near-universal, state-provided reserved paternity leave versus selective, employer-provided flexibility policies) and the dimensions of parent-child time examined (total co-present time; solo or family time). Ultimately, this dissertation expands knowledge on and presents methodological considerations for the relationship between work-family policies and parent-child time, with key implications for family well-being and gender inequality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".