MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132922688

Development of a Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Model for Individuals with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

2022· dissertation· W7132922688 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Keith Adrian Colaco

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaKrembil FoundationUniversity of TorontoArthritis SocietyNational Psoriasis Foundation
KeywordsPsoriatic arthritisFramingham Risk ScorePsoriasisRisk factorDiseaseNatriuretic peptideTroponin IBiomarker
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), collectively known as psoriatic disease (PsD), are characterized by excess cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality compared to the general population. The aim of this thesis is to identify novel biomarkers and disease-specific variables that predict CV risk beyond traditional CV risk factors in patients with PsD. Methods: Data from prospective cohorts of patients with psoriasis and PsA were analyzed. The association of serum metabolites and CV events was investigated. The association between cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and carotid atherosclerosis presence and progression was also tested. Variable selection was used to construct multiple CV risk prediction models – these included traditional CV risk factors, cardio-metabolic biomarkers and disease-specific variables. Metrics of risk prediction were used to determine whether the addition of biomarkers and disease-specific variables to each model improved their predictive performance beyond traditional CV risk factors and the Framingham Risk Score (FRS). Results: The analysis revealed several metabolites associated with CV risk. A model with 13 metabolites significantly improved prediction of CV events beyond a model with age and sex alone. A FRS-adjusted model with 11 metabolites did not improve CV risk discrimination. Investigation of cardiac biomarkers demonstrated that cTnI was independently associated with the burden of carotid atherosclerosis. Elevated cTnI and NT-proBNP were associated with a higher risk of developing CV events independent of traditional CV risk factors. Addition of cTnI or NT-proBNP did not improve the performance of the FRS for predicting CV events. Considering disease-specific variables, a CV risk prediction model for patients with PsD was constructed – this model included traditional CV risk factors and it had excellent performance in predicting CV events within a 5-year period. Disease-specific risk factors did not improve predictive performance beyond traditional CV risk factors alone. Conclusions: Serum metabolite and cardiac biomarkers are associated with the development of incident CV events in patients with PsD, but do not improve predictive performance compared to the FRS. Psoriatic disease related risk factors were not superior to traditional CV risk factors, which performed very well in predicting CV events in patients with PsD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→French-language works237,207→