The Puck Stops Here: An Inquiry into the Manufacture of Goalie Masks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present inquiry seeks to document the changing landscapes of the manufacture of ice hockey equipment in Canada. This was once a burgeoning branch of industrial activity, but has more recently been heavily impacted by outsourcing and offshoring tendencies (especially from the early 1990s onwards). In little less than two decades, imposing manufacturing plants have been systematically shut down, thoroughly reducing Canada´s share in the production of the equipment needed for the practice of what is often deemed its national game. Today, estimates suggest that roughly ninety percent of the hockey gear consumed in Canada is manufactured in the Global South. This research unfolds in the aftermath of this geographical transformation, paying particular attention to the perspective of the small manufacturers of hockey equipment that are still based on Canadian soil. For six months, I carried out participant observations and interviews in a factory where goalie masks are produced. Drawing upon the findings that derive from my experience in this setting, as well as from attending mask shows and similar events, I try to bring into light the daily routine of the factory floor; the progressive steps in the assembly line; the relationships that the workers entertain with the game of hockey; and, most fundamentally, the uncertainties faced by small companies attempting to survive at the margins of a market dominated by major corporations. In addition, I discuss the specificities of goalie masks as sporting commodities, seeking to illustrate the residues of artisanship that, in some special cases, pervade the manufacture of these objects to this day – thus resisting the general drive towards standardization that characterizes the sports equipment industry more broadly. To conclude, I engender an exploratory analysis of the different meanings that goalie masks are invested with – including as a projection of a goaltender’s identity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".