MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132925728

Structural brain findings in adults with 22q11 deletion syndrome

2004· dissertation· W7132925728 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Laura Elizabeth Keating

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Ontario
KeywordsLateral ventriclesPsychosisSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)NeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingDeletion syndromeYoung adultAnalysis of varianceVentricular system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. 22q11 Deletion Syndrome (22qDS) is a genetic syndrome associated with 22q11.2 deletions and high rates of schizophrenia. Based on brain structural findings in children with 22qDS and adults with schizophrenia compared to controls, we hypothesized that adults with 22qDS and no psychosis (22qDS-NP) would have: (1) smaller ventricular and larger gray matter volumes than adults with 22qDS and schizophrenia (22qDS-SZ) and (2) larger ventricular and smaller gray matter volumes than controls. Method. Analysis of variance and t-tests were performed on MRI scan data corrected for total intracranial volume from 22qDS-NP (n = 7), age- and sex-matched controls (n = 7) and 22qDS-SZ (n = 12) groups. Results . Ventricular volumes for 22qDS-NP were smaller than 22gDS-SZ (p = 0.004) and larger than Control groups (p = 0.04). Whole brain gray matter volumes for 22gDS-NP were intermediate to 22qDS-SZ and control subjects (p> 0.14). Conclusions. Enlarged ventricles in this small sample suggest that increased power to detect differences between 22gDS-SZ and 22gDS-NP adults may lead to the identification of brain structure findings related to the expression of schizophrenia in 22qDS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207