MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132928632

Modeling, estimation, and control of partially observable failing systems using phase method

2016· dissertation· W7132928632 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Akram Khaleghei Ghosheh Balagh

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2016
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Bayesian probabilityProcess (computing)Posterior probabilityObservableCondition-based maintenanceAutoregressive modelState (computer science)Control theory (sociology)Partially observable Markov decision process
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, due to the advances in data measurement and computer technology, it has become possible to implement effective condition monitoring (CM) systems for critical equipment which increase plant productivity. The objective is to utilize the information obtained from CM for the assessment of the actual condition of the operating equipment without any unwanted interruption. In most applications, the collected CM data involves uncertainty and relates probabilistically to the exact state of the system. Most previous maintenance and reliability models in the literature do not incorporate CM information for decision making or assume that the CM system provide full information about the system true state, which often results in poor failure prediction. This research presents a new framework for predicting failures of a partially observable deteriorating system using Bayesian control techniques. The system can be in one of three-state: healthy state, an unhealthy or deteriorated state, and a failure state. Only the failure state is assumed to be observable. A vector autoregressive model is fitted to the observation process and residuals are then calculated using the fitted model, which are indicative of system deterioration. The state deterioration evolution is modeled using three-state hidden Markov model and hidden semi-Markov model. We develop optimal maintenance policy using multivariate Bayesian control approach for developed models. The posterior probability that the process operates in an unhealthy condition is updated using Bayes' rule at each sampling epoch and used for decision making. When the posterior probability exceeds a control limit, the system is stopped and full inspection is performed which reveals the true system condition. Preventive maintenance is then carried out if the system is in the unhealthy state. The objective is to find the optimal maintenance policy minimizing the long-run expected average cost. We solve the problem in the semi-Markov decision process framework. The model parameters are estimated and explicit formulas for several important quantities for the system residual life estimation are derived as functions of a posterior probability statistic. The methodologies are illustrated using simulated and the real data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207