MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132930534

The molecular basis of Hsp70-sulfogalactolipid binding: structure/function of protein and glycolipid components

2002· dissertation· W7132930534 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Daniel Mamelak

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2002
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsGalactolipidsSulfationGlycolipidSulfotransferaseAmino acidSite-directed mutagenesisBinding siteMutagenesisPeptide sequence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heat shock/stress proteins of the 70 kD (hsp70) family have been implicated in mediating bacterial/host and sperm/egg interactions via a novel binding-specificity to the sulfated galactolipids (SGL), 3′sulfogalactosylceramide (SGC) and 3′sulfogalactosylglycerolipid(SGG). To investigate the molecular mechanism(s) of sulfated glycolipid recognition by hsp70 we have used a series of sulfated galactolipid derivatives and the recombinant testis-specific hsp70.2 gene product, rP70, as our model system. Thin layer chromatography (tlc) and receptor ELISAs demonstrated rP70 to bind specifically 3′ and 4′ sulfated galactolipids and not any other sulfated or sialic acid containing lipid. Binding to 3 ′SGL was dependent upon a ceramide-based backbone, whereas binding to 4′SGL was observed with either a ceramide or alkyhydrocarbon backbone. Binding of rP70 was not observed to the sulfated sugars heparin or 3′ sulfogalactose, suggesting that the lipid moiety and the sulfate position around the galactose ring of SGL contribute to this specific recognition event. Soluble analogues of SGC consisting of an acyl chain substitution with adamantane and a neoglycoconjugate of SGC and bovine serum albumin have both been demonstrated to function as receptors for rP70, while adamantyl-SGC inhibits rP70/SGL binding in the μM range. Proteolytic cleavage and truncation analysis demonstrated that the SGL binding site is localized within amino acids 300–387 of the highly conserved N-terminal ATPase domain of rP70. Site directed mutagenesis showed arginine 342 and phenylalanine 198 to be critical for SGL binding. Interestingly, these amino acids are conserved among all members of the hsp70 family and the ability to bind SGC/SGG is maintained among recombinant hsp70s from the bacterial pathogens, Chlamydia trachomatis , mycoplasma, Helicobacter pylori and Haemophilus influenzae. DnaK, the most widely studied intracellular chaperone also possesses SGC/SGG binding specificity. The recombinant sea urchin receptor for sperm, a member of the hsp110 family possessing 45% homology with P70, also binds SGC and SGG, extending the role of hsp70-mediated SGL recognition originally proposed in sperm/egg binding. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms of SGL recognition by hsp70 provides the basis for the rational design of specific protein, glycolipid and neogylcoconjugate compounds that may be effective in inhibiting the hsp70 adhesin function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicHeat shock proteins researchFrench-language works237,207