Regulating and Supporting Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Greenspace and Restored Meadows along a Hydro Corridor in Toronto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Meadoway project, led by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA), aims to restore 200 ha of meadow habitats along the Gatineau Hydro Corridor across Scarborough, Ontario. The hydro corridor’s transition from turf grass to deep-rooted native meadow plants is hypothesized to enhance regulating and supporting services. To evaluate this hypothesis, in-situ infiltration, penetrometer tests, and soil sampling were conducted on two pre-restored turf lands and two restored meadows in 2020. Soil samples were analyzed for bulk density, porosity, pore structure, total carbon, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus. Water balance analysis was conducted by simulating artificial rainfall events upon undisturbed vegetated soil samples accompanied by saturated hydraulic conductivity measurements. The meadow restoration altered soil structure and enhanced its runoff reduction and available water capacity, and decreased soil available phosphorus. The Meadoway can potentially enhance multiple ecosystem services including flood and erosion control, and soil quality and nutrient cycling regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".