MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132932343

Navigating the Labyrinth: Women, Work and Career Coping

2021· dissertation· W7132932343 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Devina Daya

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Diversity and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeGrounded theoryQualitative researchCoping (psychology)Career developmentThematic analysisExplanatory modelQualitative propertyFocus group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study sought to examine the life-career experiences of women in senior corporate leadership with a specific focus on career coping. This study was in response to gender discrepancy in executive leadership and focused on the minority of women who have attained high-ranking corporate positions. Using a qualitative approach to data collection, in-depth interviews were conducted with fifteen senior female leaders in Toronto, Canada. The goal of the study was to gain insight into their lived experience including their perspectives on career advancement and progression. A qualitative approach consistent with constructivist grounded theory yielded rich narratives and personal reflections that formulated underlying themes based on principles of theoretical sufficiency. The findings of data analysis validated a multidimensional approach to career navigation based on a combination of psychological, behavioural and contextual factors. The model presented in this study, illustrates each of these components on a “Career Triflex,” or a triangle, as means of highlighting the process of continually traversing between psychological, behavioural and contextual factors at various points throughout one’s career. Importantly, contained within each point on the “Career Triflex” were various career supportive items as endorsed by high ranking female executives. The psychological and behavioural components described action-oriented concepts that were directly applicable and within their locus of control. Meanwhile, the contextual component considered the role that organizations, stakeholders and/or other individuals play in supporting gender parity. This study provides nuanced conceptualizations and perspectives towards a greater understanding of how participants navigated their careers and coped with difficulty and challenge. This research addresses the lack of female representation within career theory and career counselling literature and presents a model of career coping as endorsed by a niche population of women in corporate business.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicGender Diversity and Inequality→French-language works237,207→