MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132934846

"Things Are Changing": Police Mental Health and Psychotherapeutic Help-seeking Within an Evolving Police Culture

2018· dissertation· W7132934846 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Breanne Faulkner

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2018
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolicing Practices and Perceptions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthGrounded theoryLegislationLaw enforcementIdentity (music)PerceptionMental distressOccupational safety and healthOccupational stress
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to repeated trauma exposure and significant ongoing sources of operational and organizational stress, police officers are vulnerable to mental health problems, including PTSD, depression, and other Operational Stress Injuries (OSIs). In recent years, police organizations have made efforts to build awareness and the address mental health needs of their membership, and Ontario legislation has attempted to address gaps in access to services among first responders. As such, aspects of traditional police culture which may be incompatible with psychotherapeutic help-seeking, such as norms of hegemonic masculinity, authoritarianism, and emotional control have been challenged. The current study aimed to explore the lived experiences of Ontario police officers with regard to job-related psychological distress and help-seeking, and to elucidate the complex role of contemporary police cultural norms in shaping help-seeking behaviours. In-depth research interviews were conducted with 18 police officers of various occupational ranks and roles. A constructivist grounded theory approach was utilized toward the development a model of psychological help-seeking within the contemporary police culture. Results demonstrated that although most officers reported that “things are changing” within the police cultural and institutional context, themes of weakness versus strength, us versus other, safety and suitability for the job, and co-constructed silence continue to pervade many of their experiences and perceptions of psychological difficulties, constraining help-seeking behaviours and often delaying help-seeking. Specific factors interfering with help-seeking included issues with accessibility, education, and awareness, but more prominently, identity issues, a fear of work-related consequences, and skepticism and mistrust, especially of mental health treatment providers. Establishing trust and reducing stigma via leadership and peer access points to community service providers were important facilitating factors. Psychotherapeutic service engagement often resulted in a shift away from policing as a fundamental component of identity, as well as a greater level of comfort with help-seeking, challenges to previously-held stigmas, and most powerfully, an inclination to share these experiences with one’s peers and thereby challenge the culture of silence. A model of the influence of the police culture on psychotherapeutic help-seeking among police is presented, and theoretical implications, as well as implications for prevention and intervention with police are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.013
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.388 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicPolicing Practices and PerceptionsFrench-language works237,207