Phonological and Morphological Conditions on Dorsals in Kazakh: Productivity in Production and Acceptability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis examines the productivity of place and voicing restrictions on Kazakh dorsal obstruents. Previous work claims that velars occur only with front vowels, and uvulars only with back vowels, in native Kazakh words; stem-final dorsal plosives are voiceless word-finally and voiced intervocalically in all Kazakh words; and the voiceless dorsal fricative (notated as /X/) appears only in loanwords, but its exact place and voicing behaviour remains unclear. Existing descriptions contain limited explanations and data, so key questions remain: Is the place restriction productive? Are velars and uvulars contrastive in stem-final position? How does /X/ behave? To address these questions, I conducted two nonce word experiments.The first experiment involved two production tasks: producing target dorsals in different positions and vowel environments, and producing stem-final dorsals in inflected nonce forms. The analysis examines various acoustic measurements confirm that the voicing restriction was productive, but the place restriction was not. Specifically, all dorsals were produced with the target place regardless of vowel environment, while stem-final plosives were produced with voicing intervocalically and voicelessly word-finally. The second experiment involved two acceptability judgement tasks: judging acceptability of target word-final dorsals, and judging stem-final dorsal alternations in an inflected paradigm. In the first task, participants accepted licit forms, but rejected illicit ones, with gradient acceptability favouring forms satisfying the voicing restriction over the place restriction. In the second task, participants preferred paradigms respecting the place restriction in both member forms, with gradient acceptability favouring the place restriction in inflected forms over base forms. The results for /X/ suggest that it is more velar in production, but patterns closer with uvulars in acceptability of alternations. However, it was overall not accepted as a native sound, likely due to its occurrence only in loanwords. This thesis contributes to the understanding of Kazakh phonology with production and acceptability experiments, and by finding that the place and voicing restrictions have different behaviour in production and that there seems to be gradient acceptability that privileges the voicing restriction over both the place restriction and paradigm uniformity and that privileges enforcing the place restriction on inflected forms over base stems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".