MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7132941199

Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake and Effectiveness Among Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men

2024· dissertation· W7132941199 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Catharine Chambers

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of TorontoUniversité de MontréalCanadian Immunization Research NetworkUniversity of TorontoCanadian Blood ServicesPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research Society
KeywordsVaccinationCohortHuman papillomavirusImmunizationAnal cancerMen who have sex with menHPV infectionHPV vaccines
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) have a high burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated diseases and thus are prioritized for HPV vaccination. Since 2015/16, the Canadian provinces of British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec have offered publicly funded HPV vaccination for GBM aged ≤26 years. This manuscript-based dissertation evaluated the uptake and effectiveness of HPV vaccine in GBM soon after these targeted HPV immunization programs were implemented. The Engage Cohort Study is a prospective cohort of 2,449 sexually active GBM aged ≥16 years in Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal, Canada. Participants were recruited using respondent-driven sampling from 2017 to 2019 and followed for 12 months. At each visit, participants self-reported their HPV vaccination history and, for a subset of younger GBM aged 16-30 years, self-collected anal specimens for HPV DNA testing. HPV-positive specimens were genotyped using the Roche Linear Array® commercial assay. Despite these targeted HPV immunization programs, anal HPV infection was highly prevalent among young, sexually active GBM, with over one-quarter infected with ≥1 vaccine-preventable type at baseline. HPV vaccination (self-reported receipt of ≥1 dose) was associated with lower anal HPV prevalence, incidence, and persistence of vaccine-preventable types, independent of sexual risk behaviours and after correcting for non-differential exposure misclassification associated with self-reported HPV vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness was higher when vaccination was initiated at younger ages or soon after sexual debut, consistent with current immunization guidelines that recommend vaccination prior to HPV exposure to maximize benefit. HPV vaccine coverage increased among Canadian GBM over the 12-month study period, with larger gains among younger GBM who were eligible for the publicly funded programs. Despite the high uptake among younger GBM (60-73% across cities), estimates remained below the national target of 90%, suggesting that many GBM remain at risk for HPV and its associated diseases. Community-based strategies are needed to improve HPV vaccine access and uptake through the GBM-targeted immunization programs, alongside our school-based universal programs. These findings will inform best practices for HPV primary prevention in GBM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.305
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicCervical Cancer and HPV Research→French-language works237,207→