Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to realize the full compatibility of advanced composite and sandwich structures an internally consistent and accurate modeling process is needed. Hansen and de Almeida developed a unified hierarchical theory for layered beams which has the ability to accurately predict through-the-thickness stress and strain distributions, as well as displacement moments of all combinations of symmetric laminates and sandwich structures. This theory asserts that these predictions can be developed as a superposition of sets of well chosen fundamental states, where a hierarchical sequence of bending states occurs. Fundamental states are described as numerical experiments performed on an infinitesimal segment of the physical beam. Here, piezoelectric actuation effects are considered and a new fundamental state is developed modeling the actuation within the composite or sandwich structure through the application of a uniform electric field. The capabilities of this fundamental state are shown within the confines of the hierarchical beam theory by solving three problems: a purely actuated system, a system subjected to both electrical and mechanical loads and a system of piezoelectric patches that are embedded within a composite structure. The calculated through-the-thickness stress and strain distributions and the displacement moments yield comparable results to 2-D ANSYS finite element predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".