Exploring the professional world: Lessons i have learned at my workplace.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
University internships are crucial for academic and professional development. In this work, I reflect on my experiences during this period, exploring lessons learned and challenges overcome. From the classroom to the field, every moment has been an opportunity to grow and discover the professional world. This work represents the closing of an academic cycle and the beginning of a new phase of professional development. My case might be a bit different from my peers since I am validating my workplace as my university internship, which has presented significant challenges for me. I am working at Servicios Logísticos Cartagena S.A.S, where we support our parent company, Katoen Natie. Katoen Natie is a multinational company of Belgian origin, primarily focused on supporting large multinational companies with the transportation and storage of their products. The mission of the company is simple: creating maximum added value. Katoen Natie achieves this by providing tailor-made, full-service logistics and engineering solutions to a key number of customers worldwide. Currently, our four offices are located in the Torre del Puerto building in Manga, with around 70 people working towards the same goal: Providing the best customer service possible. In SLC, we primarily focus on providing support to our Katoen Natie warehouses in the United States and Canada, acting as data processors—the "front line" receiving our clients' requests. To provide a bit more context, the logistics sector of the United States is advanced and complex, supported by extensive transportation infrastructure, cutting-edge technology, and comprehensive services. Regarding my goals when starting to work at the company, my main objective was to learn more about the logistics sector, as it has always been where I wanted to work as a professional. It is a highly competitive sector not only locally but also internationally. Additionally, I was very curious to learn about the types of systems and databases (such as SAP and PLATO) that large companies use to track all movements of their products. This kind of knowledge makes me a more well-rounded and prepared professional while enriching my resume at the same time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.025 | 0.034 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.028 | 0.026 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.028 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".