MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132965874

Living in the In-between: Implications of Counter Narratives of Immigrant Youth with Disabilities in the Canadian Nation State

2021· dissertation· W7132965874 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Chavon Niles

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Rights and Representation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsImmigrationRefugeeNarrativeIdentity (music)Mental healthState (computer science)Youth studiesLived experience
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2016, the Provincial Advocate for Children and Youth published a longitudinal study sharing the stories of children and youth with disabilities across Ontario, Canada. Largely missing were the stories of LGBT+, Indigenous, newcomer and/or racialized youth with disabilities. This is a common practice, which continues to erase those who experience a confluence of systemic barriers. When disabled youth are written about it is usually from a service user perspective, especially regarding mental health (see Beiser et al., 2011; Shakya, Khanlou, Gonsalves, 2010; Simich, Beiser, Stewart, Mwakarimba, 2005) through a biomedical lens. Moreover, there is a dominant practice to write about disability as a single identity that defines the experiences of the individual. This leaves out attention to the migration experiences of racialized immigrant youth with disabilities. The study used open-ended semi-structured interviews with 10 (5 males and 5 females) racialized immigrant youth (ages 16-24) with disabilities living in the Greater Toronto Area in Ontario, Canada. Participants illustrate how dominant discourses of disability as a deficit, burden, and undesirable impacts their sense of self-worth, which is intrinsically tied to their employment, their educational journey and how they do/not access navigate health and social services. Their stories also bring to the forefront the complexity of migration pathways and signals the need to rethink migration as occurring on multiple planes leading many to occupy an in-between space. This study contributes to our understandings of disability as they are shaped by changes in Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that continues to define and classify disabled people and the lack of critical scholarly research in the critical disability studies and immigrant youth literature in Canada. Through first-person storytelling, this study challenges racism and ableism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0500.026
Scholarly communication0.0120.005
Open science0.0040.012
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicDisability Rights and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207