MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132966665

A Computational Value-Based Framework for Dynamic Emotion Expression, Suppression and Exaggeration

2023· dissertation· W7132966665 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Yang Teoh

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotions and Moral Behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExaggerationNormativeSalience (neuroscience)Interpersonal communicationMisattribution of memoryExpression (computer science)Priming (agriculture)Leverage (statistics)Context (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psychological research emphasizes that emotion expressions serve important adaptive and communicative social functions to coordinate behavior between people. Yet an equally extensive body of research also suggests that people do not always express the emotions they feel, sometimes even suppressing them to the detriment of their own long-term social, psychological, and physical well-being. Implicit in this tension is the assumption that despite furnishing communicative benefits, expressing emotions, particularly negative emotions, sometimes incurs substantial costs to the expresser. However, researchers have only more recently begun to quantify these costs, and little is known about whether and how people consider these potential benefits and costs when expressing or suppressing their emotions. In my thesis, I propose that emotion expression constitutes a value-based decision and develop both a novel experimental paradigm and computational model to map out the dynamics of this cost-benefit analysis during real-time expressive decisions. I then leverage these tools to show that people flexibly regulate their expressions by calibrating the anticipated costs and benefits of expressing different emotions to the relevant attributes of the social context (e.g., self-interest, partner’s welfare, and overall inequality). Additionally, I subsequently demonstrate how interpersonal processes like reputational concern and its salience during these social interactions influences expressive decisions by selectively priming people to default to expressions of positive emotions like joy and driving them to use their emotion expressions to signal normative social preferences like inequality aversion more strongly. In sum, my thesis presents a novel approach to understanding emotion expression and demonstrates how such an approach can reveal the social cognitive processes that enable people to flexibly express, suppress, or even exaggerate their emotions in different social contexts. My work here lays a foundation for further research to examine not only how other contextual factors influences dynamic emotion expression, but also whether these expressions are effective in signaling their intentions to perceivers, and what perceivers infer from them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.389 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicEmotions and Moral BehaviorFrench-language works237,207