MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132970758

Domestic Homicide: Examining the Role of Male Perpetrator Suicidality

2025· dissertation· W7132970758 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicholas Ostapchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Canadian institutionsEmployment and Social Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomestic violenceContext (archaeology)HomicidePoison controlSuicide preventionNarrativeSituated
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Male perpetrator depression and suicidality has been shown to be associated with domestic homicide perpetration. The association between suicidality and domestic homicide perpetration may be particularly strong in the context of coercive control. While aspects of male perpetrator suicidality have been linked to coercive control, there are also other documented reasons for male perpetrator suicidality in domestic violence contexts (e.g., relational disruption, maladaptive coping mechanisms). Given that some scattered research has revealed relationships amongst coercive control, male perpetrator suicidality, and domestic homicide, further research should continue to explore these relationships and also explore the degree to which non-coercive and coercive narratives are situated within accounts of male perpetrator suicidality. A two-study mixed-methods approach was taken to achieve this. Study 1 quantitatively examined the link between coercive control and suicidality by analyzing 16 years of data from Ontario’s Domestic Violence Death Review Committee. Results demonstrate high rates of homicide-suicide, prior threats of suicide, and prior suicide attempts in perpetrators of domestic homicide. Results also outline differential relationships between each of the three aforementioned aspects of suicidality with coercive control and with non-coercive risk. Study 2 qualitatively explored female survivors’ and the bereaved’s construals of male perpetrator suicidality within their broader experiences of domestic homicide and domestic violence. Reflexive thematic analysis was completed with in depth interviews with 13 survivors and 2 proxies. Dominant themes were generated in the form of three dimensions, which outline how male perpetrator suicidality was situated within narratives of coercive control and within narratives of male depression and poor mental health across various contexts and times. Results across both studies highlight the relevance of male perpetrator suicidality in the context of domestic homicide and domestic violence. Both studies also demonstrated how one important way of understanding male perpetrator threats of suicide is as one tactic of coercive control. Put together, these key learnings have critical implications for violence risk assessment, suicide risk assessment of men, and the treatment of violent men. These implications and future directions for preventing and ending domestic homicide are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseFrench-language works237,207