Living into the Emerging Ecumenical Paradigm: A Process of Conscientization and Discernment Toward Just Intercultural Community for Christianity in the Canadian Context
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Canadian Christianity is moving into a new era described by David J Bosch as the emerging ecumenical paradigm, Bernard Lonergan as the possibility of many unique christianities, Karl Rahner as the third great epoch, Walbert Bühlmann as the Third Church, and Lamin Sanneh as a church no longer confined by western European cultural ways of thinking. This new context requires new tools for different ways of being Christian. This study documents the development of The Forum for Intercultural Leadership and Learning and the five-day Engage Difference! program as responses to the need to resource Canadian Christian communities to understand their cultures and contexts, and to develop local theologies, praxes, and pedagogies. The Engage Difference! approach draws on an emerging ecumenical consensus about the need for a new embrace of the diversity of the global Church. It provides visions of Just Intercultural community, Beloved Community, and Biblical Shalom as ways to embrace that diversity in Canada. This thesis describes and explores cultural self-awareness and its role in relationship across cultural and other difference. It names barriers to intercultural ministry for Canadian churches including the Canadian peacemaker myth, the myth of the Ideal British Colony, and Canada’s multiculturalism. Strategies to counter these myths and provide tools for local theologies and praxes include intentional processes of conscientization shaped by the see-discern-act-celebrate hermeneutic circle, Ivan Illich’s epimethean approach and convivial tools, poiesis or ministry as art, and pedagogies from non-western sources. Using the Appreciative Inquiry “4-D” cycle, of Discovery, Dream, Design, and Destiny and focus groups of program participants, resource people and facilitators, and institutional stakeholders the research tested the efficacy of those strategies, documented this Canadian ecumenical work as a resource for the wider Church, named the visions of Just Intercultural community that emerged, envisioned next steps for the program, and made recommendations to Canadian churches. This study describes ways the program is helping Canadian Christian communities discern God’s vision for living into the “emerging ecumenical paradigm” and how the program is creating inspired spaces for visions of Just Intercultural community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".