MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132976798

Cell and molecular biological studies of the hypersensitive response induced in cowpea by the cowpea rust fungus

2002· dissertation· W7132976798 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Michael J. R. Mould

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2002
Typedissertation
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural pest management studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsHypersensitive responseFungusRust (programming language)Plant cellCytoplasmPathogenGeneCellPathogenic fungus
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cytological and molecular biological approach was undertaken to examine the events that occur during the very early stages of the hypersensitive response (HR) in cowpea midvein epidermal cells that are being infected by the cowpea rust fungus. The HR is one of the most-ubiquitous defense responses that plants exhibit in response to pathogen infection and has been defined as the rapid, localized cell death in association with disease resistance. For the cytological portion of the study, stereological ultrastructural analyses of rust fungus infected and uninfected midvein epidermal cells from resistant and susceptible plants indicated that transcription and translation were up-regulated in the cells of the resistant plant while the fungus was penetrating through the plant cell wall, and prior to fungal contact with the plant plasma membrane. Conversely, in the rust-susceptible cells, there was evidence that decreases in transcription and translation occurred in the rust fungus-infected cells at this same stage of infection. To identify genes that were up-regulated in the rust resistant cowpea cells during this very early stage of the penetration process, cytoplasm was extracted from individual epidermal cells of rust fungus-inoculated and uninoculated plants that were either resistant or susceptible to the fungus. RNA was isolated from each of the extracted cell types and amplified in a non-gene-specific manner in order to generate a 3′ EST library for each of the four cell types. Differential screening of the library generated from the infected-resistant cells resulted in the identification of three overall groups of genes. These were genes that were up-regulated in both the infected-resistant and -susceptible cells, those that appeared to be suppressed in the infected-susceptible plants and those that were up-regulated only in the infected-resistant cells. Genes in the latter situation differed from those reported previously for studies of the HR that involved sample tissue including both living cells and those advanced in the death process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.791

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicAgricultural pest management studiesFrench-language works237,207