MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132979459

Daddy and Papa: Canadian Gay Men Becoming Parents, Caring for their Families, and Constructing Fatherhood

2025· dissertation· W7132979459 on OpenAlexaffabout
S W Underwood

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasculinityScrutinyConstruct (python library)ReflexivityNormativeFace (sociological concept)Ideology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gay fathers who parent together without a female caregiver represent an historically novel family unit, gaining federal recognition in Canada in 2005. Since then, an increasing number of Canadian gay men have pursued parenthood. Without easy access to the means of reproduction, prospective gay fathers must navigate complex pathways that primarily include different forms of adoption and surrogacy. Each pathway has costs and benefits and requires different resources. I analyze how gay men who pursue adoption develop a reflexive approach to fatherhood as they proceed under the scrutiny of a critical state. Gay men who pursue surrogacy, however, draw on normative scripts of masculinity as they anticipate fatherhood, reflecting the mastery they enjoy as they purchase the means of reproduction. Once fathers, they face the challenges of intensive childcare. They expect to remain involved with and receive childcare support from their gay community and families but receive little. The Canadian organization of childcare, the demands of intensive parenting, and the geographic distance between them and their communities and families complicate their access to support. Consequently, many fathers, especially those with older children, develop ties with the straight parents of their children’s friends. Additionally, I analyze how Canadian gay fathers navigate family and gender ideology as they take on the work of childcare. I show that they distance themselves from the models of masculinity and fatherhood that they know best. Given their histories with their fathers and relationship with masculinity, they construct fatherhood as ‘unlike’ their dads’ and instead as ‘like’ their mothers. Like other fathers, they integrate nurturance and emotion into fatherhood, but unlike other fathers, they readily identify with the many women in their lives, including their mothers, sisters, female friends, and paid female experts. Their fatherhood evinces little need to guard their identities as masculine, aligning more closely with expectations of motherhood and women. I conclude by discussing the limitations of this research, as well as the limitations of what we know about gay fathers in Canada and finally identify further directions and areas for inquiry within the developing field of the sociology of gay fatherhood in Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0390.012
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207