“The Enemies Next Door”: Stalinist Repression in the Postwar Latvian Countryside
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation explores postwar Stalinist repression in the Latvian countryside, and especially in Vidzeme province, focusing on the March 1949 Soviet mass deportation, and on the broader repression of the so-called “kulaks,” “bandits” and “convicted nationalists” and their families. It is a work of social history “from below” and is concerned with the survival strategies of ordinary rural Latvians. It seeks to explore peasant mood, mentality and public opinion in the face of postwar repression and asks how and why rural Latvians felt compelled to participate in – or resist – repression. It explores how repression impacted family life and neighbourly relations. The dissertation examines the images of the “kulak,” “bandit” and “convicted nationalist,” finding that in both official sources and those presenting the voices of ordinary peasants, there was a great preoccupation with unmasking and destroying “enemies.” It presents case studies of two regions (pagasti), showing how land reforms, kulak-branding, mass deportations, and arrests of political criminals combined to create conditions where some families clearly benefited at the expense of others. It examines the criminal files of arrested “bandit supporters,” revealing the morally complicated situations many rural people faced, and the ways they were often compelled to turn against their neighbours. This dissertation finds that violence had a significant presence in everyday life is the postwar Latvian countryside; shoot-outs, revenge killings, armed robberies, kidnappings, beatings and other violent acts were all commonplace. Although the Soviet war against the Latvian peasantry was without question ignited from above, and directed from above, it was nevertheless fought from below, with Latvian peasants participating in the postwar struggle in a very real way. For various reasons, rural Latvians took part on both the Soviet and anti-Soviet sides – and it was virtually impossible to remain neutral. Thus, Latvians were deeply mistrustful of their neighbours. Betrayal, revenge, denunciation, secrecy, “unmasking,” and living under a false identity were key survival strategies of the postwar Latvian peasantry. Although division among the peasantry is not always emphasized in the Baltic historiography, the sources – both human and archival – of the postwar era tell a more complex story about the enemies next door.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".