MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132982673

Biochar for Urban Forestry Applications: Improving Tree Establishment in Urban Soils

2025· dissertation· W7132982673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melanie Amber Sifton

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSeedling growth and survival studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiocharSlash-and-charSoil waterAmendmentBiomass (ecology)Temperate climateDeforestation (computer science)Soil fertilityVegetation (pathology)Soil conditioner
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of the global population lives in urban areas and trends indicate urbanization will continue to increase into the future. Urban soil and forest health is a concern as communities struggle to support vegetation in the face of climate change, drought, soil disturbance, compaction, erosion, nutrient imbalances, and environmental toxins. Biochar is a novel climate-positive high-carbon soil amendment created through pyrolysis of organic material. Recent research has demonstrated biochar benefits for agriculture, but it remains understudied for urban applications. Biochar use varies with feedstock and processing, but availability is rising in Canada and across the world as researchers study its production methods and qualities for different applications. When correctly matched to soil conditions, biochar amendments increase plant survival and growth in difficult conditions via improvements to soil chemistry, structure, and plant nutrition. My thesis investigates biochar applications to improve establishment of trees and shrubs in urban forests. Through a series of greenhouse and multi-year field trials of wood biochar as a soil amendment in fine-textured high-pH urban soils in Toronto, Canada, I found that 20 t/ha doses of wood biochar in a range of particle sizes 1) induced positive growth, nutrient, and survival effects on a range of temperate woody plants with notable responses from N-fixing and pioneer species, 2) increased soil C and reduced soil bulk density, without significant effect on soil moisture, 3) when combined with microbial or N-fixing companion plant biofertilizers, led to significant gains in plant growth and nutrient uptake compared to biochars alone. This research is the first to test biochars in combination with bacterial, inert yeast, and N-fixing companion plant biofertilizers on woody species, and includes the largest urban forestry field trial to date in terms of scale and species diversity. The results show biochar holds promise to improve urban soil conditions and woody plant growth, particularly in combination with biofertilizers. Future research should test biochars with co-amendments across a range of additional species and nursery production, street tree, soft surface, and green roof urban plantings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicSeedling growth and survival studiesFrench-language works237,207