MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132987646

Application of Algal Biofilms for the Recovery of Rare Earth Elements from Dilute Aqueous Solution via Biosorption

2024· dissertation· W7132987646 on OpenAlexaff
Mitchell Thomas Ellwood Zak

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiosorptionAdsorptionDesorptionExtracellular polymeric substanceChlorella sorokinianaLanthanumAqueous solutionSorption
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rare earth elements are a critical resource and there is interest in meeting the growing demand by recovering them from waste sources, but conventional recovery methods are not economically feasible. One alternative is to adsorb metal ions onto microbial biomass, but the poor mechanical properties make microbial biomass difficult to implement. This thesis investigated using algal biofilms for rare earth biosorption as an improvement over suspended biomass by comparing adsorption isotherms, kinetics, selectivity, and desorption recovery between the two. Euglena mutabilis biofilms have a higher maximum lanthanum adsorption capacity than suspended Euglena (65 vs. 25 mg/g respectively). This increase was caused by the biofilm’s extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) matrix providing additional binding sites for adsorption. The EPS matrix adsorbed metal ions via an ion exchange reaction where rare earths substituted the ionic crosslinkers (e.g., Ca2+, Mg2+) and had an estimated lanthanum adsorption capacity of 360 mg/g. In a multi-rare earth system, biofilms adsorbed up to 35% more heavier rare earths from Er to Lu than suspensions due to binding sites provided by EPS. The largest adsorption capacities for the biofilm biomass were Sm, Eu, Yb, and Lu with 0.035, 0.033, 0.033, and 0.031 mmol/g respectively. The presence of calcium and magnesium did not affect adsorption onto the biofilm, but iron reduced total rare earth adsorption by up to 25% due to competitive adsorption. Recovery of rare earths via acid desorption was higher with biofilms than suspensions with 86 vs 72% recovery of lanthanum using HCl. Preferential desorption of heavier rare earths from Ho to Lu occurred at higher pH for both Euglena suspensions and biofilms. After three repeated adsorption-desorption cycles using HCl, the lanthanum adsorption capacity of biofilms increased by up to 3.8 times its initial value due to the co-desorption of other metal ions from the EPS matrix “activating” the biofilm biomass. These results demonstrate that biofilms have several advantages over suspended biomass for rare earth biosorption due to the EPS matrix. Testing in a continuous system however is necessary to fully establish the industrial potential for biofilm biosorption to recover rare earths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207