Croatian national revival - First croatian opera - Vatroslav Lisinski: Ljubav i zloba
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
U radu se bavimo Hrvatskim narodnim preporodom i političkim prilikama u 19. stoljeću na području današnje Hrvatske. Od politički i teritorijalno raslojene zemlje dolazimo do zemlje s jedinstvenim službenim jezikom. Dug je bio taj put i na njemu se pojavila prva hrvatska nacionalna opera - Ljubav i zloba Vatroslava Lisinskog. Opera je imala dva libretista, prvo Janka Cara, a kasnije doktora Dimitriju Demetra koji je Carev libreto prepravio i potpuno dopisao drugi čin. Opera se bavi problemima koji se mogu povezati s tadašnjom situacijom u zemlji, ali ima sretan kraj. Opera je praizvedena 1846. u kazalištu na Markovom trgu koje je moglo primiti oko 750 gledatelja. To je bio velik događaj za Zagrepčane kojih je tada bilo oko 15.000 naseljenih. Ne smijemo zaboraviti Alberta Štrigu po čijoj ideji i na čiji nagovor je opera zapravo i nastala. On je bio ključ koji je sve pokrenuo i neumorno se angažirao da opera ugleda svjetlo dana. Sačuvani rukopisni izvornici libreta danas se smatraju nacionalnim blagom koje je utabalo put i omogućilo drugim umjetnicima da njihova djela zasjaju i sjajnije od Ljubavi i zlobe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it