The contribution of Doreen Hall to the development of Orff-Schulwerk in Canada, 1954--1986
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study will be of interest to historians of music education as well as those who are interested in the development of Orff---Schulwerk in North America from 1955 to 1986. Historical data from primary sources and published books and articles serve as the basis for this study of Doreen Hall's remarkable career in music education. During the period of 1954 to 1986 Hall worked tirelessly in order to introduce the ideas of Carl Orff into music education in Canada and the United States. This study attempts to provide an overview of the main events and initiatives Hall was involved in that led to the acceptance of Orff---Schulwerk (the name given to Orff's philosophy of music education and those techniques that defined it) in North America. This study also attempts to understand the meaning of Hall's work for music education in the public schools of Canada. Even though the focus is on the significance of her work for music education in Canada, key events that she was involved in that influenced the acceptance of Orff---Schulwerk in the United States will also be touched upon. Chapters One and Two establish the context for this study by providing an overview of Orff's work in Munich at the Guntherschule as well as the nature of music education in Canada when Doreen Hall began her work. Chapters 2--5 review and analyze the significance of the many events and initiatives Doreen Hall was involved with in order to establish Orff---Schulwerk in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".