MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132993786

A case study of the university training programme - Non-commissioned members of the Royal Military College of Canada

2006· dissertation· W7132993786 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bernadette Gallacher Dececchi

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2006
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndragogyTransformative learningAdult educationGraduation (instrument)Adult LearningHigher educationLifelong learningFurther educationCommission
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a case study of a professional development programme in the form of an adult education university programme at the Royal Military College (RMC) of Canada. The participants of the study are members or former members of the University Training Plan Non Commissioned Members (UTPNCM) or are university professors or administrators of RMC. The University Training Plan for Non Commissioned Members is an unique education programme. It allows Non Commissioned Members (NCM) of the Canadian Forces (CF) to attain a university degree and upon graduation gain a Queen's Commission in the CF at the rank of junior officer. The thesis also reviews the field of Adult Education and the philosophical basis for the independent study of adult students. Andragogy (Knowles, 1980) and adult learning principles (Macheracher, 2004) are discussed as they relate to the adult students of the UTPNCM. The thesis study explores the participants' perceptions of their experience of being adult students while remaining full time members of the CF. The academic duties of the adult students together with the military requirements of the programme were explored in the effects that these had as barriers to the success of the individuals in the programme. The Cross (1981) Barriers to Education Model was employed to describe the dispositional, situational and institutional barriers faced by the UTPNCM students as they experienced the various demands of the programme. The possibility of the UTPNCM programme as a Transformative Learning experience as described by Mezirow (1991) was discussed and the role of Prior Learning Assessment and Recognition (PLAR) in the programme was reviewed. The participants were asked to describe their own experiences within the programme and they highlighted areas of concern in their interviews, which were the primary investigating tool of the case study. Participants discussed the pressure of the demand of being adult students on their various family units; the challenges of participating in the programme under the Four Pillar Model of curriculum at RMC; and the demands of Second Language Training (SLT) at RMC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicHigher Education Learning PracticesFrench-language works237,207