MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7132993846

A Crip Incarnational Model of Ministry

2025· dissertation· en· W7132993846 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miriam Mara Elizabeth Spies

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTheological Perspectives and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBaptismConversationChristian ministryContext (archaeology)SolidarityEcclesiologyConstruct (python library)Pastoral theology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation presents an incarnational theology and practice of ministry and, drawing on disability studies and crip theory, re-imagines an incarnational crip theology and practice of ministry through preaching the Word, administering the sacraments, and providing pastoral care. Incarnational theology challenges the Church to an honest and imaginative embracing of embodiment in all its created diversity, specifically disabled and crip bodies constricted by ableism. An interdisciplinary methodology brings incarnational and ecclesial theology into conversation with crip and disability studies to construct an incarnational crip practical theology of ministry. The specific context of The United Church of Canada shows a history of work in disability theology and provides a lens for examining collaborative ministry. This thesis uses the incarnational ecclesiological work of Bonhoeffer to posit that the church embodies Christ as and in community and that Christ is in solidarity with humanity. Incarnational theology embraces the goodness of embodiment and the gift of diversity, and disability theologians contribute to understanding these concepts through disabled and crip bodies. The thesis employs several disability theologians to open a conversation about leadership in the church drawing on the resources of both theological and disability and crip studies, illustrating the value of this critical correlational method. Drawing this out, the thesis focuses on preaching, sacraments and pastoral care to construct an alternative expression of a crip theology and practice of ministry. Regarding the proclamation of the Word, crip concepts of disclosure and performance enrich the understanding and expression of testimony and collaborative preaching. Regarding the sacraments of baptism and communion, the contributions of crip liturgical time and space enrich the theology and practice of these rites shaped by crip bodies. Finally, crip care webs and access intimacy help imagine an alternative model of pastoral care that shows how we can encounter Christ as we recognize each other’s needs and appropriately care for each other. The research has implications for the construction of a disability theology of ministry and the role of communities of faith and denominations in its practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.766

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicTheological Perspectives and PracticesFrench-language works237,207