Impacto organizacional, social, personal y económico generado en los emprendedores, emprendedoras, empresarios y empresarias formados y acompañados con la metodología de la Escuela de Empresarios de Quebec en el marco del proyecto C.R.E.C.E. Mujer – Sincelejo, Sucre.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen........................................................................................................................................13 Abstract..........................................................................................................................................15 Introducción...................................................................................................................................16 1. Definición del Problema............................................................................................................19 1.1. Planteamiento del Problema...........................................................................................19 1.2. Formulación del Problema.............................................................................................22 2. Objetivos....................................................................................................................................23 2.1. Objetivo General............................................................................................................23 2.2. Objetivos Específicos.....................................................................................................23 3. Justificación...............................................................................................................................24 4. Antecedentes..............................................................................................................................27 4.1. Antecedentes Internacionales.........................................................................................27 4.2. Antecedentes Nacional...................................................................................................38 4.3. Antecedentes Local........................................................................................................43 5. Marco de Referencia..................................................................................................................45 5.1. Marco Teórico................................................................................................................45 5.1.1. Impacto....................................................................................................................45 5.1.2. Impacto organizacional............................................................................................48 5.1.3. Impacto social..........................................................................................................50 5.1.4. Impacto personal......................................................................................................52 5.1.5. Impacto económico..................................................................................................53 5.1.6. Emprendedores........................................................................................................54 5.1.7. Empresarios..............................................................................................................56 5.1.8. Formación empresarial.............................................................................................58 5.1.9. Espíritu emprendedor...............................................................................................59 5.1.10. Habilidades emprendedoras...................................................................................60 5.1.11. Competencias emprendedoras...............................................................................62 5.1.12. Habilidades empresariales o directivas..................................................................64 5.1.13. Competencias empresariales o directivas..............................................................66 5.2. Marco Legal...................................................................................................................67 5.3. Marco histórico..............................................................................................................72 5.3.1. Escuela de Empresarios de Quebec.........................................................................72 5.3.2. Proyecto C.R.E.C.E. en Sincelejo. Sucre.................................................................78 6. Metodología...............................................................................................................................79 6.1. Método de Estudio.........................................................................................................79 6.2. Tipo de estudio...............................................................................................................80 6.3. Técnicas para la recolección de la información.............................................................81 6.4. Población........................................................................................................................83 6.5. Muestra...........................................................................................................................83 6.6. Fuentes Primarias y Secundarias....................................................................................85 7. Resultados y Discusión..............................................................................................................87 7.1. Proceso de desarrollo de la metodología de la Escuela de Empresarios de Quebec en el marco del proyecto C.R.E.C.E. Mujer – Sincelejo. Sucre....................................................87 7.1.1. Escuela de empresarios de Quebec (EEQ)...............................................................87 7.1.2. Proyecto C.R.E.C.E. Mujer – Sincelejo. Sucre........................................................89 7.2. Aspectos para identificar el impacto organizacional. social. personal y económico generado de la metodología de la Escuela de Empresarios de Quebec en el marco del proyecto C.R.E.C.E. Mujer – Sincelejo. Sucre.......................................................................................................91 7.2.1. Impacto organizacional............................................................................................91 7.2.2. Impacto Social.........................................................................................................94 7.2.3. Impacto personal......................................................................................................96 7.2.4. Impacto económico..................................................................................................98 7.3. Análisis del impacto organizacional. social. personal y económico generado por la metodología aplicada por la Escuela de Empresarios de Quebec en Sincelejo. Sucre en emprendedores. emprendedoras. empresarios y empresarias.............................................100 7.3.1. Impacto organizacional..........................................................................................114 7.3.2. Impacto Social.......................................................................................................122 7.3.3. Impacto personal....................................................................................................129 7.3.4. Impacto económico................................................................................................133 Limitaciones................................................................................................................................138 Conclusiones................................................................................................................................139 Recomendaciones........................................................................................................................143 Referencias bibliográficas...........................................................................................................145 Anexos.........................................................................................................................................163
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".