MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133002566

Circles and Rivets: Cosmology and Teleology in Plato's Theory of the Soul

2020· dissertation· W7133002566 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas Roland Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoulTeleologySentenceImmortalityIndeterminacy (philosophy)Motion (physics)Exposition (narrative)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I propose a novel account of the soul in Plato’s philosophy as an entity that has surface, depth, location, extension, and is capable of contact and resistance. I take as my starting point Plato’s claim that the soul is the source of motion in the world and argue that while the soul has many characteristics normally associated with bodies, it is not a body. The distinguishing mark of the corporeal is visibility, and the soul is not visible. I show that we can see the spatial understanding of the soul most clearly in the Timaeus’ account of the soul’s creation. The soul is composed of eight circles. They are fashioned from incorporeal and corporeal varieties of Being, Sameness, and Difference. That the soul is half-corporeal and half-incorporeal allows it to interact with bodies in the way it needs to, but also relate to intelligible, incorporeal entities as a knower of them, which allows the soul to be the source of specifically orderly motion. Next, I take up an important consequence of the soul being in contact with bodies: it is vulnerable to them. Our soul is always in danger from bodily forces, and the body is the cause of all psychic disorders. I defend a new translation of a crucial sentence at Timaeus 86b that has been widely misunderstood. Nevertheless, the body is useful for the soul. The gods showed their resourcefulness when they made our bodies: they used the body’s inevitable imperfections to serve the goal of improving our souls. This is at the heart of what I call the instrumental relationship between the soul and body. I conclude by examining Plato’s theory of reincarnation. The theory functions as a natural-philosophical explanation of how non-human animals came into existence, which was required for the perfection of the cosmos. I argue that there is a trend, exemplified in the Timaeus and Laws, away from seeing reincarnation as a punishment for the individual soul and more towards thinking of it as useful for the perfection of the cosmos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.025
Scholarly communication0.0050.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicClassical Philosophy and ThoughtFrench-language works237,207