MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133007636

Malignant Europeanization: Schengen, Irregular Migration Governance, and Insecurity on Europe's Peripheries

2017· dissertation· W7133007636 on OpenAlexaff
Craig Damian Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2017
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDirectorate-General for Justice and ConsumersDirectorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement NegotiationsEuropean CommissionDirectorate-General for Migration and Home Affairs
KeywordsAuthoritarianismDemocracyArgument (complex analysis)IncentiveNorm (philosophy)ImmigrationRefugeeForeign policySecurity policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines the relationship between open borders and free mobility in Europe, the Schengen regime, and security around Europe’s peripheries. Schengen is a constitutive element of the European project. Its maintenance depends on what the EU refers to as “compensatory measures” for addressing uncontrolled migration. I ask two questions: What is the relationship between the European project and changes in irregular migration systems? How do Schengen’s compensatory measures meet the EU’s stated foreign policy goals of fostering a ring of stable democracies in its near-abroad? My causal argument is that Schengen’s compensatory measures cause changes in irregular migration systems, which result in insecurity around Europe’s peripheries. I argue these dynamics are evidence of Malignant Europeanization, which I define as insecurity and regressive practices and norms resulting from Europe’s regional integration. I situate this project in the Europeanization literature, which analyzes relationships between European integration and changes in practices, institutions, and norms. Europeanization’s main indicators are reform toward democratic governance, rule of law, rights protections, and liberal market economies: benign Europeanization. In contrast, I identify eight indicators for Malignant Europeanization: migrant insecurity; increased transnational crime; security sector corruption; emboldened militarized non-state actors; domestic political contestation; entrenched authoritarianism and democratic backsliding; burden-shifting and regional tensions; and international norm degeneration. Findings are based on comparative case studies across four irregular migration systems: the Western Mediterranean, Central Mediterranean, Western Balkans, and Central and Eastern Europe. Evidence is derived from three years of fieldwork. Variation depends on domestic characteristics in transit states and external incentive structures. In the absence of membership incentives Europe lacks leverage to foster benign Europeanization. Findings problematize the framing of Europe as a progressive global influence. They also raise significant questions about the effectiveness of European foreign policy goals of fostering a ring of stable democracies around its near abroad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0000.005
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207