MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133010228

Dominance, Survivance, and Resistance: Reconceptualizing Childhoods Through Literature

2024· dissertation· W7133010228 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neil Ramjewan

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonialismRhetorical questionPsychoanalytic theoryScholarshipIndigenousNarrativeRomanceAgency (philosophy)Childhood studies
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Childhood is a social construction and discursive site of contestation that extends beyond the dominant paradigm of developmental psychology. These constructions of childhood are predominantly projects undertaken by adults through research, educational practice, and artistic endeavors such as the writing of literature. While the field of childhood studies claims to be inter- and multidisciplinary, it continues to be dominated by sociological approaches and is evasive of colonial and racial analytic tools to attend to the histories of Black, Brown, and Indigenous children and childhoods. Beginning from my own history of childhood trauma in the process of dislocation from the postcolonial Caribbean to the settler colonial Canadian nation-state, I turn to literary children who endure the colonial violence of rape to understand ongoing settler colonialism. Drawing on the work of Edward Said and Erica Burman, I construct a contrapuntal child-as-method to trace the figure and rhetorical function of the child across the literatures of dominance, survivance, and resistance. First, I read the state-sanctioned Survivors Speak report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada which I understand as a site of Indigenous and settler trauma. Drawing on Cathy Caruth’s literary trauma theory, I argue that the report is a site where settlers reconcile their own lost imperial childhood which is rooted in romantic and psychoanalytic notions of the innocent and ignorant child. Next, I read Tomson Highway’s trickster novel, Kiss of the Fur Queen, while drawing on Gerald Vizenor’s notions of survivance and the postindian warrior to theorize the postindian child. I bridge scholarship on civilizational progress and development, children’s sexuality, innocence, and queer theory’s subjectless critique, which undoes identity. I extend this to Vizenor’s notion of the postindian as a similar kind of subjectless critique that interpellates the reader to a critical reading of contradictory simulations. Here, the resistive and healing tendencies of the postindian child engages in processes of disidentification from dominant simulations of a colonial generational order while turning to a maternal and gynocratic order. Finally, I read Nalo Hopkinson’s Afrofuturistic novel, Midnight Robber, to engage conversations about childhood agency through the Afro-Caribbean girl child. Drawing on Caribbean poet Kamau Brathwaite’s notion of arrivance, popularized in Jodi Byrd’s critique of settler colonial binaries, I theorize the arrivant child, or the dislocated child of the enslaved with no option to return home. I argue that the arrivant child is a destabilizing figure that offers insights into relational forms of agency as it remakes home from the maroon on stolen Indigenous land. I show how the arrivant child is in a double bind such that for some children their actions, regardless of their agentic capacity, make them complicit in their own oppression. Finally, I conclude the dissertation by exploring how childhood as curriculum can transform subjectivity and open and ethical space through the literary imaginaries of imperialisms Others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.005
Science and technology studies0.0240.115
Scholarly communication0.0250.023
Open science0.0040.013
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→