MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133010284

Fetal ethanol exposure and meconium analysis of fatty acid ethyl esters in neonatal screening: The first Canadian population-based study

2006· dissertation· W7133010284 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joey Nicky Gareri

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2006
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeconiumEthanolFetusEthyl esterBiomarkerAlcoholPopulation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Challenges in identifying children exposed prenatally to ethanol necessitate the development of a biomarker to screen for neonates at risk for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. Meconium fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE), products of non-oxidative ethanol metabolism, have been established as a novel biomarker of fetal ethanol exposure. This study is the first application of this test to a regional neonatal population in Canada. Six-hundred eighty-two anonymously collected meconium samples were analyzed by GC-FID and GC-MS. Ethyl myristate, ethyl palmitate, ethyl palmitoleate, ethyl stearate, ethyl oleate, ethyl linolate, ethyl linolenate, and ethyl arachidonate were measured. GC-FID screening produced a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 97% with positive and negative predictive values of 45.9% and 100%, respectively, for successful GC-MS confirmation. FAEE analysis detected 5-fold more ethanol-exposed pregnancies than standard post-partum screening in this population, demonstrating a 2.5% prevalence of fetal ethanol exposure, consistent with CDC estimates of 'frequent' prenatal drinking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.158

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects→French-language works237,207→