Successful leadership practices in an accountable policy context: influence on student achievement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ontario's education system is currently undergoing a profound change, the scope of which has not been seen since the last great global movement of economic and educational restructuring that occurred more than a century ago (Leithwood et al., 1999). Changes in the accountability policy context of schools are taking place as the education system aligns itself with the demands of preparing students for success in the twenty-first century. This study explores the leadership practices of successful school principals in this accountable policy context and the influence these practices have on improving student achievement. Four questions are addressed in this study. (1) What leadership practices aimed at improving their schools do successful school principals employ? (2) How does the accountable policy context influence their practice? (3) What beliefs and values shape the nature of these practices? (4) What forms of professional development and ongoing learning will assist principals in acquiring these practices? A framework demonstrating the interdependencies of these processes on the principals' leadership practice provides the perspective through which these questions are addressed. Results serve to illuminate the changing role of principals in an accountable policy context. Not only must principals be leaders of instruction, they must also be leaders who transform the culture of their school to focus on improved student learning. In addressing the demands of this context, these leaders demonstrated six broad categories of successful leadership practice. These included: a focus on improving student outcomes; articulating this focus in a planned, deliberate manner; supporting and empowering teachers; building positive relationships with parents and community; fostering a safe and supportive learning environment; and projecting an encouraging and motivating attitude. Results also demonstrated a strong relationship between the values of these principals and their leadership practices--a relationship that has been referred to as demonstrating "authentic leadership" (Begley, 1999). Finally, results pointed to the need for new approaches to professional development for principals in this context. The research sample consisted of twenty-three participants comprised of parents, teachers and principals from six schools in one school district in Ontario. Data collection was carried out using interviews to address perspectives about the successful leadership practice in their school.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".