MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133011949

A Multimodal Neuroimaging Study of Alcohol Use Disorder: Functional Connectivity, Endocannabinoid Metabolism and Clinical Outcomes during Abstinence

2025· dissertation· W7133011949 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ruobing Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2025
Typedissertation
Language
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsFatty acid amide hydrolaseEndocannabinoid systemAlcohol use disorderAlcoholAbstinenceNeuroimagingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingAnandamideMonoacylglycerol lipase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is marked by dysregulation of functional connectivity (FC) which may be pertinent to symptoms during abstinence. Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), a metabolizing enzyme of anandamide, modulates frontoamygdala FC. We investigated the abnormalities of FC in AUD and whether impairments were associated with higher FAAH levels and poorer clinical outcomes. AUD and control participants completed a resting-state MRI and PET scan with the FAAH tracer, [11C]CURB. Frontoamygdala FC was significantly lower in AUD than controls, with a greater effect in severe AUD participants. In AUD, no relationship was found between FAAH and frontoamygdala FC. Frontoamygdala FC showed a significant negative correlation with mood and withdrawal symptoms. Lower frontoamygdala FC was seen in AUD, which was related to clinical outcomes, but not FAAH levels. The current study suggests that lowered FC may be clinically relevant, and the role of FAAH in regulating FC may differ in AUD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior→French-language works237,207→