MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133014319

Investigating Risks Associated with Influenza Infection in Patients with or at Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Using Epidemiological Techniques

2024· dissertation· W7133014319 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Bahar Behrouzi

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2024
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoCanadian Cardiovascular Society
KeywordsAdverse effectDiseaseInfluenza vaccineVaccinationEpidemiologyCohortCohort studyRandomized controlled trial
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and influenza were the 2nd and 6th leading causes of death in Canada in the pre-pandemic era. Influenza contributes to significant cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with CVD, which may be prevented with influenza vaccines. Yet, many high-risk patients with CVD and other underlying medical conditions demonstrate a reduced response to vaccines, which decreases effectiveness for preventing adverse events. High-dose influenza vaccines, typically reserved for older adults with weaker immune systems, may augment the immune response in patients with CVD and further reduce morbidity and death. The overall objective of this thesis is to leverage real-world routinely collected and pragmatic trial data to study the preventative benefit of influenza vaccination and the determinants and burden of illness post-viral respiratory infection in patients with underlying medical conditions, focusing on CVD. Aim 1 (Chapter 2) is a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials evaluating standard seasonal influenza vaccine against placebo or standard care in patients with varying phenotypes of CVD and CV risk, to evaluate the possible cardioprotective benefits of influenza vaccination. Aim 2 (Chapter 3) is a recurrent events analysis of the INVESTED trial to identify predictors of first and recurrent cardiopulmonary hospitalizations and death in a contemporary cohort of high-risk CV patients, as well as whether the high-dose versus the standard-dose influenza vaccine is associated with fewer recurrent major adverse CV events. Finally, Aim 3 (Chapter 4) is a population-based, test-positive retrospective cohort study to estimate and compare the burden of adverse outcomes, including CV hospitalization, in the acute and post-acute phases of influenza infection by care setting, over five pre-pandemic influenza seasons. In summary, these three aims – all novel contributions to the literature - will provide added insights into viral respiratory infections like influenza by exploring the burden experienced by patients with highly prevalent underlying medical conditions like CVD. These patients represent an important target population for the rapidly developing field of viral vaccines, and learnings from them are applicable to many other underlying medical conditions that are susceptible to the same underlying pathophysiologic immune-modulation and frailty mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.010
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→