Myths of war and nation: towards an understanding of culture and citizenship in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although liberalism claims that citizenship is a universal status that is extended equally to all members of the national community, in reality individuals experience their citizenship differently depending on their social identities. Recently, in an effort to address these inequalities, attention has shifted to the terrain of culture as a key site for the conditioning of political subjects and, as a result, relations of governance. This development has influenced citizenship theorists to consider expanding their conception of rights to include cultural rights. However, many of these attempts reflect an inadequate understanding of how culture is implicated in ruling relations. The first chapters of this thesis investigate the limitations of liberalism, particularly with regards to its proven inability to deal effectively with difference, as well as the theories of Gramsci, Althusser and Foucault in an attempt to plot an alternative theoretical framework; one that promotes a more expanded notion of the political and is therefore more conducive to recognising all the sites and means in/by which power operates. This theoretical review is undertaken in preparation for the research that lies at the centre of this thesis, which consists of a cultural analysis of a particular moment in public culture, the honour rituals that marked the interment of Canada's Unknown Soldier in May 2000, in which common sense knowledges of Canadian-ness are produced and promoted. By undertaking a discourse analysis of the texts that accompanied the ceremonies, I demonstrate the extent to which the representations that are generated therein are very particular expressions of race, gender and class power and thus, are instrumental in conditioning unequal relations of citizenship. I conclude the work by offering recommendation towards a re-definition of citizenship, particularly in the area of cultural rights, as well as some suggestions for the policy and practice of civic education. As a sustained discussion of the cultural origins of political relations, this thesis represents a valuable contribution to citizenship theory, particularly with regards to the issue of cultural rights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.036 | 0.041 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".