MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133023578

Functional Properties of Monomers and Oligomers ofthe M2 Muscarinic Receptor

2014· dissertation· W7133023578 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dar'ya Sergiivna Redka

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2014
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsAllosteric regulationCooperativityG protein-coupled receptorReceptorCooperative bindingBinding siteMonomerG protein
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane proteins and mediate signaling for a host of neurotransmitters, hormones and other stimuli from light to odorants. Despite their ubiquity and importance, their mechanism of action remains unknown. That uncertainty derives in part from uncertainty over their oligomeric status and the origin of a characteristic, efficacy-correlated heterogeneity revealed in the binding of agonists. If GPCRs signal as monomers, the heterogeneity could be induced by the G protein; if they signal as oligomers, it can be attributed to a mix of cooperativity and asymmetry among orthosteric sites within the oligomeric array. A related question concerns the relevance, if any, of a topographically distinct allosteric site known to interact with the orthosteric site. To examine these questions, M

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→