MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133024277

Theory from the Trenches: Revolutionary Decolonization on Pakistan’s Landed Estates

2022· dissertation· W7133024277 on OpenAlexaff
Shozab Raza

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2022
Typedissertation
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonial History and Postcolonial Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommunismPoliticsPeasantMillenarianismCONTESTEnlightenmentDecolonizationSolidaritySubaltern
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, we have seen renewed efforts to contest the afterlives of colonialism. Statues have been discarded; buildings and institutions renamed. One point of dispute is the role of the West in decolonization. Some argue that, historically, political actors in the global South, in confronting colonialism, were realizing Europe’s universalist Enlightenment ideals. Others maintain that various anti-colonialisms promoted “alternative universalisms” exterior to European Enlightenment, and that decolonization today even requires “delinking” from Western epistemologies entirely. Yet these debates often reproduce a binary between the West and the rest, obscuring the ideational linkages between the two. How can we move beyond this binary to consider the global articulation of ideas in projects of decolonization? My dissertation addresses this question by exploring how subaltern actors draw on various ideas, European and otherwise, to generate concepts to advance revolutionary decolonization. Through a historical ethnography of communist-led peasant insurgencies on Pakistan’s colonial-fortified landed “estates” (jagirs), I show how peasants crafted concepts to combat imperialism, landlordism, and even patriarchy. During the 1970s, landless peasants in the “Punjab Frontier” region began to occupy these estates, especially after enrolling in a communist party that argued these estates were illegitimate remnants of colonialism. The party also energized peasants to theorize, and to see the importance of theory for political practice. To further their political objectives, peasants creatively stretched the party’s communist theory for their specific contexts, while also taking inspiration from radical movements across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. I conceptualize their theory as “trench theory”, with the trench metaphor flagging a mode of subterranean theorizing for political combat. To track this “trench theory”, I conduct what I call a “theory-ography”, a thick description of people’s everyday theory-making practices. I specifically draw on 20 months of field research, oral histories, and various under-researched archives. In sum, my dissertation explores the historical, political, and intellectual inheritances that shape peasant theorizing, and shows how peasants can be cosmopolitan theoretical actors, whose insights speak to issues of global concern. Refuting their parochial designation, Pakistan’s peasant revolutionaries drew on multiple sources, vernacular and transnational, to theorize for a worldly, even other-worldly, liberation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.044
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicColonial History and Postcolonial StudiesFrench-language works237,207