MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133024323

Critical care nurses' efforts to pass along knowledge: a moral endeavour

2004· dissertation· W7133024323 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie Edwards

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typedissertation
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBody of knowledgeHealth careInterpretation (philosophy)Work (physics)Psychological interventionKnowledge translationNursing careMEDLINE
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to explore and describe the work of critical care nurses to pass along knowledge of patients to other members of the health care team. Of particular interest were the following questions: which aspects of their understanding of patients do critical care nurses pass along to other health care team members; how is knowledge passed along; and for what purposes or to what ends is knowledge passed along? Data collection for this descriptive, interpretive study occurred in two intensive care units in a tertiary care hospital in Canada. Ten registered nurses, two males and eight females, volunteered to take part in the study. Participants were observed as they provided other health care providers with knowledge of the patients in their care and interviewed regarding this aspect of their work. Interpretation of the data involved multiple readings of the generated text, and a constant back and forth between parts of the text and the whole text. One theme, filling out the picture, was identified from the data. In order to fill out the picture, nurses passed along knowledge of the patient's current status, knowledge of changes in patient responses over time, knowledge the nurses believed others cared about, knowledge of interventions that worked, and knowledge of the patient as a person and member of a family. Knowledge was conveyed in different ways: as threads of data, by linking together information from the patient's body systems, through thinking out loud, by pointing, and by building a case. It was clear that the work of critical care nurses to pass along to others knowledge of the patients in their care was a moral endeavour, as evidenced by nurses' persistent and directed efforts, arising from their sense of obligation to the patient, to achieve the particular end of the well-being of patients and family members. Proximity to patients and to other health care team members was essential for this moral work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.046
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.068
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0460.068
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.074
Scholarly communication0.0200.013
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0050.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.511
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units→French-language works237,207→