MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133025274

Inhibitory BMO signaling controls mammalian renal branching morphogenesis in vivo

2006· dissertation· W7133025274 on OpenAlexaff
Sunny Sun-Hee Hartwig

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2006
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRenal and related cancers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidney developmentUreteric budBone morphogenetic proteinSignal transductionEmbryonic stem cellMorphogenesisKidneyTransgene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this thesis I investigated the role of the inhibitory Bmp signaling pathway during mouse kidney renal development using (i) genetic haploinsufficiency models to investigate the functions of Bmp2 and Gpc3-Bmp2 interactions during renal development in vivo and (ii) conditional Alk3 loss-of-function in the UB lineage to investigate the function of Alk3-dependent Bmp signaling during RBM in vivo. During embryonic development, the collecting duct system of the kidney arises through iterative growth and branching of the ureteric bud (UB) and daughter collecting ducts, a process termed renal branching morphogenesis (RBM). Previous work in our lab identified an inhibitory ALK3-dependent BMP signaling pathway that controls cellular and morphogenetic events during RBM in vitro and in transgenic over-expression mouse models. However, the early embryonic lethality of homozygous Bmp2-/- and Alk3-/- mice has precluded complementary conventional loss-of-function studies to define the role of Bmp signaling during renal development in vivo. Results from this thesis provide the first genetic evidence that an inhibitory Bmp2 signaling pathway controls UB cell proliferation and branching during RBM in vivo, and that Bmp2 signaling is genetically modulated by Gpc3. Further, these results demonstrate an essential requirement of ALK3-dependent Bmp signaling for normal kidney development in vivo, and identify a critical architectural role for ALK3 in establishing and maintaining the primary UB branching pattern.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicRenal and related cancersFrench-language works237,207