MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133028747

Elucidating the Role of Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 in Crohn’s Disease Pathogenesis and Neutrophil Biology

2023· dissertation· W7133028747 on OpenAlexafffund
Bana Samman

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2023
Typedissertation
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCrohn's and Colitis CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsLRRK2PathogenesisKinaseContext (archaeology)DiseaseProinflammatory cytokineInflammationInflammatory bowel diseaseProtein kinase domainIntracellular
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crohn’s disease (CD) is a debilitating chronic inflammatory bowel disease that can significantly reduce a person’s quality of life. Kinase domain gain-of-function variants of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2), such as G2019S, are associated with an increased risk of CD and have been shown to enhance both myeloid cell trafficking and protection against intracellular infections, yet their role in disease pathogenesis remains elusive. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that LRRK2 kinase hyperactivity boosts enteric pathogen clearance in a selectively advantageous manner but simultaneously underlies the exacerbated inflammatory pathology characteristic of CD. We demonstrated that, in the context of C. rodentium-induced colitis, Lrrk2G2019S mice exhibited neither enhanced protection nor hyperinflammation relative to wild-type controls, and that neither the deficiency of Lrrk2 nor its G2019S mutation altered neutrophils’ capacity to degranulate in vitro or migrate in vivo. Future studies will aim to further investigate the role of LRRK2 in neutrophils using other models of inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→