MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7133029307

Concussions in Competitive Artistic Swimming: Investigating Incidence and Injury Context through a Community-based Approach

2019· dissertation· W7133029307 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Laura Danielle McClemont Steacy

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionContext (archaeology)AthletesIncidence (geometry)Injury preventionPoison controlMoodSuicide prevention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artistic (synchronized) swimming is a fast-paced, predominantly female aesthetic sport on which there has been very little research. Despite origins in theatrical performance, the physical demands of artistic swimming have evolved significantly, subsequently increasing the potential for traumatic injury, including concussion. Sport-related concussion is a traumatic brain injury that can result in behavioural complaints, cognitive impairments, mood disturbance, and altered sleep. Despite findings that female athletes may experience a greater rate of concussion, more symptoms, and longer recovery than male athletes, females remain under-represented in sport concussion research. Sport-related concussion in artistic swimming has not yet been examined. The purpose of this research was to explore the incidence and injury context of sport-related concussion in youth artistic swimmers in Ontario within a community-based research setting. First, a retrospective study examined the injury context factors surrounding concussions sustained during artistic swimming. Second, a prospective study measured the incidence of concussion in this population over one season, and further explored the injury context of concussion. The incidence risk of concussion was 1.91%, and the clinical incidence was 1.91 per 100 athletes. The most frequent mechanism of injury was contact with another athlete, most commonly during pattern transitions and highlights. Concussions occurred most frequently in in-pool training between November and March, and in the deep-end of the pool. Valuable sport-specific concussion resources for the artistic swimming community were developed through collaboration with Ontario Artistic Swimming. One of these resources was an injury tracking program. A qualitative study examining coaches’ perceptions of the injury tracker provided valuable feedback for improvements. The important lessons learned from this partnership include the identification of contact between athletes in artistic swimming, findings of concussion incidence comparable to other girls’ sports, and description of the injury contexts associated with concussion in artistic swimming. Exploration of concussion in artistic swimming is warranted to protect the health and safety of these athletes, to expand the research on sport concussion in girls and women, and assist coaches and officials in understanding the nature of concussions in artistic swimming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury Research→French-language works237,207→