MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7133035320

Role of Dapagliflozin in Attenuating Right Ventricular Remodelling: Transverse Aortic Constriction Model

2021· dissertation· W7133035320 on OpenAlexaff
Aylin Visram

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2021
Typedissertation
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDapagliflozinPressure overloadConstrictionHeart failureHeart diseaseCardiac catheterizationCardiac dysfunctionMuscle hypertrophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart Failure (HF) might be better considered a biventricular disease whereby left ventricular (LV) dysfunction leads to right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and vice versa. Structurally, the two chambers not only share a common septum and a pericardial space, but also share myocyte bundles that cross between the ventricles. Dapagliflozin is a sodium glucose linked co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that has recently been shown to improve heart function in the setting of diabetes. However, the effect of dapagliflozin on HF in a non-diabetic setting is unknown. Currently, dysfunction of the RV does not have a treatment strategy that has displayed a reduction in mortality. Therefore, we hypothesized that by reducing excess fluid volume, dapagliflozin will reduce RV chamber dilatation and wall tension, thereby leading to a reduction in RV hypertrophy and improved function. We utilized transverse aortic constriction (TAC) to induce pressure overload and administered one of three treatments: vehicle, dapagliflozin or perindopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. At end study, measurement for biochemistry, echocardiography and cardiac catheterization took place. Overall, our results demonstrate a neutral impact by dapagliflozin, on a pressure overload induced model of TAC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpaceSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207